There is an intrinsic connection between the philosophical and the literary (to the extent that it conveys meaning, literature is under the command of the philosophical) and the phallocentric. (39)

Could a bisexual practice of reading and writing be possible?

I am always bothered by the word bisexual

so clinical

for something that is always trying to

exceed

any sort of boundary-making

Reading in this way would have the name of the institution

but

then

(and this is the important part)

it would

get out of its underwear like that Ferlingetti poem by the same name

and 

run around naked/neked

Bisexuality - that is to say the location within oneself of the presence of both sexes, 

evident and insistent in different ways according to the individual, 

the non-exclusion of difference or of a sex, 

and starting with this 

"permission" 

one gives oneself, 

the multiplication of the effects of desire's inscription on

every part of the body

and

the other body.

(41)